I recently read a review by Ken Rockwell on the Voigtlander
35mm f1.4 Nokton that I often use with the NEX.
His review was quite negative, but when a new Leica 35mm f1.4 Summilux ASPH
is literally 10 times the price to buy new, maybe he is missing the point. I am sure the Summilux is a sharper lens, but
for this money, so it damn well should be.
I have noted in a recent review that colour and sharpness of the Nokton significantly improves as it is stopped down, and I am sure wide open the Summilux will be better. However, as I have shown with other fast wide angles, this is a common issue.
I have noted in a recent review that colour and sharpness of the Nokton significantly improves as it is stopped down, and I am sure wide open the Summilux will be better. However, as I have shown with other fast wide angles, this is a common issue.
Using Leica M mount lenses has well and truly gone beyond
the high end, very wealthy Leica M photog; which I think is all that he cares
about. Many people use them with EVILs,
like me, which also are 1/10th the price of an M9.
For under $500 used or $700 new, there is no smaller, sharper 35mm f1.4
lens out there. For any small 35mm lens by
Leica, you would need at least $1200 more for the marginally better 35mm f2.5
Summarit; and for other 3rd party brands you’d need an extra $700 for a
Carl Zeiss 35mm f2. A Leica 35mm f2 pre-ASPH
Summicron, still goes for $2000+ used for a 25 year old lens. Any of these lenses are at least 1 stop slower than the Nokton.
In Mr Rockwell’s defence (and to whom his blog seems to be aimed at) I noticed how picky Leica owners
can be when I sold my Leica 90mm f2 Summicron.
Sure my lens wasn’t perfect but it was amazing what Leica owners would
pick at. The tiny mark here or there
became a very big deal. The true Leica
Man wants it all.
Sony NEX-3, Voigtlander 35mm f1.4 Nokton |
Footnote: Steve Huff's article on the Voigtlander 35mm f1.4 Nokton is, in contrast, VERY positive; even when shooting on an M9. He believes that the Nokton's 'flaws' are actually positives as they render the photograph in a much more classical way, like older Leica lenses. Huff believes that this is a lens with 'Leica magic' (suggesting there's some characteristics that are like a $10K Leica Noctilux!); and for the price point, an unbeatable combination. My point precisely.
I wonder if Rockwell actually uses the lens for the review. He's notorious for reviewing stuff without actually using the product.
ReplyDelete