Camera Industry Commentary

After more than a decade of growth fuelled by the digital revolution, the camera manufacturers are now in decline.  The market is now saturated, people are only renewing what they have, and manufacturers really haven't offered anything truly innovative to the average consumer.  Sure, some cool stuff, like the A7/A7r, has come out that appeals to enthusiasts, but nothing revolutionary for the 'man on the street'.

Manufacturers also failed to see the smart phone revolution, which has stolen most of the compact camera business, and even now none of the traditional manufacturer offers (with the exception of Sony) offers a phone with a camera in it, or a partnership with a phone manufacturer.

What I am looking for is something to change my photographical life, not just a new lens or body, but something indispensible that doesn't leave my side.  Not sure what that is yet, but I'll know it when I see it, and I doubt it will come from Canon, Nikon or Fuji.

Coolpix A - More thoughts

After a three months with the Coolpix A, I actually really quite like it.  It still falls into the category of brilliant or terrible (probably just like me...), but I am really just appreciating quality in my pocket, which it achieves handsomely.  For this reason it is actually getting quite a lot of use, and it is certainly a lot more compact than my NEX 5n with any lens attached.

Low light ability is still poor compared to what I was hoping, however good light results have centainly exceeded what I was expecting too.  As I purchased it with a few scratches, I don't baby it and the tough metal body means I have less to worry about if it gets dropped. 

Compared to the Fuji X-100, in general it is sharper in good light, but falls behind in low light, and the fill in flash doesn't even compare.  But again, an X-100 isn't pocketable.

Its on trips like our little venture to Amsterdam Brewery that this camera shines.  I just kept it in my pocket and pulled it out as a photo opportunity came by, with great results.

All in all, a good purchase

Amsterdam Brewery - Nikon Coolpix A

Amsterdam Brewery - Nikon Coolpix A

Amsterdam Brewery - Nikon Coolpix A

Amsterdam Brewery - Nikon Coolpix A

Amsterdam Brewery - Nikon Coolpix A

Sony 16-50mm lens - just a plastic fantastic

My father in law purchased a Sony NEX 3n that I wrote about some time back, and it comes with the very light and compact Sony 16-50mm lens, a very useful lens for the NEX range.  However light and compact does not mean durable, and a drop on to carpet put the lens out of commission.  I lent my father in law my Sigma 30mm prime and its now awaiting a quote from the repair technician.  However being so light and plastic, I don't have high hopes, so the question becomes what if it can't be fixed relatively cheaply?  There are a few options:

1) Purchase a new lens.  an expensive option as they go for about $330 + tax

2) Purchase a used lens.  Not a bad option, as they go for about $200.

3) Purchase another NEX3n.  Again not a bad option as Henry's Outlet Centre is selling them for $315 + tax (still more than my father in law paid for it).  If you sell one of the bodies, which you should get $200-240 for, this is probably the best option, as the total replacement outlay will be just over $100.  Obviously this takes a bit of effort.

4) Get another E mount lens.  Again worth looking at, but I know my father in law will miss the convenience and compactness of the 16-50mm.  He could look at a 18-55mm which should be available used for under $100, or one of the Sigma primes (19mm or 30mm) are also a good deal at about $130.

Nikon Coolpix A

Smartphone Purchase - with a photographer's mindset

It's quite unbelievable actually, my recent smartphone purchase was the first time I have purchased a phone for myself.  I've had company phones before, and shared one with my wife, but never bought one for myself.  A recent job change within my company necessitated this, so off I went to study what was out there.  Here's my findings

iPhone 5s

Probably my first choice, with an excellent reputation and a very good camera, but very expensive at $730 purchase, or tied with expensive $70+ per month plans.

Nokia Lumia 1020

My second choice, just, but for different reasons.   The one and only reason to purchase this phone is the unbelievably good camera.  The rest of the phone is good, but not exactly class leading, and the Windows environment is not as developed as Android or iOS.  Only available with expensive plans too.

Samsung Galaxy S4

A very solid phone, and class leading up until recently.  It has a good camera, interface and there are lots of apps available.  The best thing about this phone is that it accepts micro SD cards for extra storage. The price is now coming down, with some carriers offering it on cheaper plans.

Samsung Galaxy S3

Still a decent phone, and my cheapest option if I took out a plan.  Way behind the best android phones though.

Nexus 5 - my purchase

Its probably the class leading Android phone at the moment, tied with the LG G2, with its only weakness being the camera.  Still it isn't bad and the camera does have vibration reduction, but it's just not as good as the phones above.  

Its key selling point is price.  At less than half the cost of all the other phones (except the S3) to purchase outright, the value is there.  Compared to purchasing a iPhone 5s on a 2 year plan, it is almost $1000 cheaper to buy the Nexus 5 outright and go into a no contract month by month sign up.  That's serious cash, and with the federal government putting pressure on carriers to reduce cost and improve service, it's probably a good idea to be in a position to be able to change contracts at will.  For the huge cost difference, I don't need an iPhone or Nokia 1020 that bad.

Nikon Coolpix A - A short review

Recently I acquired a Nikon Coolpix A in a trade for my Fuji GA645i, and thought it would be an opportune time to share some thoughts.  

The camera itself is far from mint, and has some cosmetic "war wounds" as the seller put it, but it works fine, and the screen and lens are all good.  I wasn't using the Fuji much, so an opportunity to pick up a really nice digital compact that I could get some use out of was a tempting offer.

The Coolpix A is not a cheap piece of equipment to purchase new, retailing for almost $1,300.  Its claim to fame is having a large DX size sensor in a true compact body, that is truly pocketable, in a way that a Fuji X100 and Sony NEX 5 aren't quite.  It has a sharp 18.5mm lens (equivalent to 28mm) and a large 3" high definition screen.

First impressions with this camera are good.  The camera has a nice heft, but is still relatively light, the buttons feel like precision instruments and the whole camera gives an impression like it was carved out of billet aluminum, just like a Barnack Leica.

On my first test run, which was in good light, the lens proved to be very sharp and the sensor showed excellent detail, on par with the better DX sensors in DSLRs.  I'm sure the lack of an Optical Low Pass Filter helps in this regard. The AF is reasonably quick, though not  DSLR quick, and most shots seem to look very nice. All in all, a fun camera to have around.

A later test in a darker indoor environment started to show a few flaws.  Firstly the AF is much slower and not as reliable, and if you use it on macro mode, which enables the AF to zoom through the entire range, it can be 'moment missing' in darker environments.  The DX sensor isn't as good in low light as what I thought it would be.  ISO 3200 show quite a bit of noise, more than the Fuji X100, and about on par with my D90; though certainly better than my mother in law's Nikon Coolpix P330 with the 1/1.7" sensor (which coincidentally was launched on the same day).  This is actually quite disappointing as this is where I saw the camera as being most beneficial versus a regular compact.  

Another issue is the very strange colour balance in low incandescent light.  If you use the white balance to incandescent or set the colour temperature even lower, it gives the shadows and an ugly blue tinge, which is very disconcerting, and takes a bit of work is post processing to get it out.

The other big disappointment is the flash, which on Aperture Priority or Manual, is almost always completely out, and generally an utter disaster.  It works fine on Program or Auto mode, so I may take a look to see if there is 'user error' involved.  However, compared to the 100% reliable and always perfect flash on the X100, this is very disappointing.

One area that was better than expected was manual focus.  Compared to the X100, even with the latest firm ware, it is much quicker and more precise.  The other nice feature was the full menu, almost the same as Nikon's DSLRs, allowing for a lot of adjustability.

So overall first impressions?  A nice, but relatively flawed camera, like an early build X100 was.  I honestly thought it would be better.  Would I pay $1300 for it?  No way.  But at the approx $400 or so from trade value, it was still a good deal.